| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
| |
(Portage version: 2.1.11.9/cvs/Linux i686, signed Manifest commit with key C1DE54B2)
|
|
|
|
| |
(Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha120/cvs/Linux x86_64, signed Manifest commit with key B4AFF2C2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
discuss with upstream. Also keywording ~amd64/~x86 as initial tests have been very good.
(Portage version: 2.1.10.55/cvs/Linux x86_64, signed Manifest commit with key 786037A7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Initial ebuilds were user submitted (Thanks to all those who contributed to bug 168890). I have made a number of modifications/fixes and have removed all keywords(package is masked). Ebuild now gets through repoman w/o any qa concerns but I will need to continue to revise it until it is ready to keyword as ~amd64 and ~x86 for user testing.
(Portage version: 2.1.10.55/cvs/Linux x86_64, signed Manifest commit with key 786037A7)
|
|
Initial ebuilds were user submitted (Thanks to all those who contributed to bug 168890). I have made a number of modifications/fixes and have removed all keywords(package is masked). Ebuild now gets through repoman w/o any qa concerns but I will need to continue to revise it until it is ready to keyword as ~amd64 and ~x86 for user testing.
(Portage version: 2.1.10.55/cvs/Linux x86_64)
|