diff options
author | Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org> | 2023-09-01 20:04:21 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org> | 2023-09-05 09:01:11 -0400 |
commit | 47709089ee12235f32005aa2295aec843164af16 (patch) | |
tree | 3296e30d67f60505b891fec7d3adde3a4a2476e1 /eclass/qt6-build.eclass | |
parent | dev-qt/qtwebengine: refactor qt6 ebuild, various fixes incl. musl (diff) | |
download | gentoo-47709089ee12235f32005aa2295aec843164af16.tar.gz gentoo-47709089ee12235f32005aa2295aec843164af16.tar.bz2 gentoo-47709089ee12235f32005aa2295aec843164af16.zip |
qt6-build.eclass: workaround mismatching cpu flags sets
qsimd_p.h tries determine if x86-64-v3 or v4 sets supported by the
compiler+flags seem complete, and errors out if not. This works out
rather badly on Gentoo, even -march=native can fail with some hard.
With qsimd_p.h being a private header this only affects dev-qt/*
packages, but fwics still need to fix all of dev-qt/* at once given
they are going to be using private bits from qtbase.
Debated a few options for this:
1. Patch headers (like old fix from bug #898644), but just not setting
e.g. __haswell__ is not enough when __AVX2__ still confuses some
code. Then unsetting these without going through the compiler leads
to left over macros and more confusion. Besides... changing system
headers behavior (why is __AVX2__ undef with -mavx2!?) only in
distros tend to end in disaster.
2. Detect issues in qtbase ebuild, then disable x86intrin altogether
if needed (carries over to other modules) + warn users (aka figure
it out yourself). Not really great, users may also end up
mismatching flags between dev-qt/ to fix this and then run into
issues anyway.
3. Backport the next (wip/unmerged) upstream fix[1] but wait, looks
like we are currently still playing whack-a-mole:
# if defined(__AVX2__)
// List of features present with -march=x86-64-v3 and not architecturally
// implied by __AVX2__
# define ARCH_HASWELL_MACROS \
(__AVX2__ && __BMI__ && __BMI2__ && __F16C__ \
&& __FMA__ && __LZCNT__ && __POPCNT__)
# if ARCH_HASWELL_MACROS == 0
# error "Please enable all x86-64-v3 extensions; <snip>
...so -mno-avx2 -mfma (bug #908420) is fine, older (bug #898644)
is too, but if for any reason (VMs, buggy hardware, or the machine
without F16C from bug #910419) anything else is disabled, then the
issue is still there and may in fact trigger more than before.
4. Similarly to #2, detect issues but in the eclass. Then append
-mno-* as needed to flags. Not too bad but passing -mno-*
leads us to bug #913400.
5. Based on users flags, pick highest usable -march=x86-64-v* and
strip everything else (or strip -march too...). Messy and think
users wouldn't be happy about this. It would be what upstream
likely wants us to do though, and causes no further problems.
Ultimately went with #4 for now, bug #913400 needs fixing either way.
- missing from set in #3 += -mno-avx2 (until #3, also -mno-fma)
- missing the AVX512* checked in qsimd_h += -mno-avx512*
(then let compiler disable features that depend on these)
Not great but better than doing nothing, no-op for non-affected users.
[1] https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/498799
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/898644
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/913400
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/908420
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'eclass/qt6-build.eclass')
-rw-r--r-- | eclass/qt6-build.eclass | 35 |
1 files changed, 34 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/eclass/qt6-build.eclass b/eclass/qt6-build.eclass index f6ed180a6979..8db83524d5e3 100644 --- a/eclass/qt6-build.eclass +++ b/eclass/qt6-build.eclass @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ _QT6_BUILD_ECLASS=1 [[ ${CATEGORY} != dev-qt ]] && die "${ECLASS} is only to be used for building Qt6" -inherit cmake flag-o-matic +inherit cmake flag-o-matic toolchain-funcs # @ECLASS_VARIABLE: QT6_MODULE # @PRE_INHERIT @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ qt6-build_src_prepare() { fi _qt6-build_prepare_env + _qt6-build_match_cpu_flags } # @FUNCTION: qt6-build_src_configure @@ -235,6 +236,38 @@ _qt6-build_create_user_facing_links() { done < "${BUILD_DIR}"/user_facing_tool_links.txt || die } +# @FUNCTION: _qt6-build_match_cpu_flags +# @INTERNAL +# @DESCRIPTION: +# Try to adjust -m* cpu CXXFLAGS so that they match a configuration +# accepted by Qt's headers, see bug #908420. +_qt6-build_match_cpu_flags() { + use amd64 || use x86 || return 0 + + local flags=() intrin intrins + while IFS=' ' read -ra intrins; do + [[ ${intrins[*]} == *=[^_]* && ${intrins[*]} == *=_* ]] && + for intrin in "${intrins[@]}"; do + [[ ${intrin} == *?=[^_]* ]] && flags+=(-mno-${intrin%=*}) + done + done < <( + # TODO: review if can drop fma= matching after QTBUG-116357 + $(tc-getCXX) -E -P ${CXXFLAGS} ${CPPFLAGS} - <<-EOF | tail -n 2 + #if defined(__GNUC__) && (defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__i386__)) + #include <x86intrin.h> + #endif + avx2=__AVX2__ =__BMI__ =__BMI2__ =__F16C__ fma=__FMA__ =__LZCNT__ =__POPCNT__ + avx512f=__AVX512F__ avx512bw=__AVX512BW__ avx512cd=__AVX512CD__ avx512dq=__AVX512DQ__ avx512vl=__AVX512VL__ + EOF + assert + ) + + if (( ${#flags[@]} )); then + einfo "Adjusting CXXFLAGS for https://bugs.gentoo.org/908420 with: ${flags[*]}" + append-cxxflags "${flags[@]}" + fi +} + # @FUNCTION: _qt6-build_prepare_env # @INTERNAL # @DESCRIPTION: |