| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.48, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.48, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/489144
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.48, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.48, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.40, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ARM tuples will change from armv7a-hardfloat-linux-gnueabi to
armv7a-unknown-linux-gnueabihf or similar in the 17.0 profiles. The
function already treated the latter as hardfloat but this commit will
now treat ambiguous tuples such as arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi as
softfloat rather than hardfloat. This brings Gentoo in line with most
of the ARM Linux community. However, the function will now check
existing toolchains to avoid breaking existing systems, if possible.
This has been achieved by splitting the function in three,
tc-detect-is-softfloat for checking existing toolchains,
tc-tuple-is-softfloat for checking just the tuple, and the new
tc-is-softfloat that calls the first two. The output from the first
two could be compared to inform the user that they are not using a
recommended tuplet.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
CTARGET is used, if defined, otherwise CHOST. CHOST was previously
assumed but this should not affect existing usage of these helpers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This returns the name of the C preprocessor for the toolchain being
built if CTARGET is defined, or the toolchain being used otherwise. It
is primarily intended to determine characteristics about an existing
toolchain's target as these may differ from what the tuple suggests.
It is not necessary to add the full set of tc-getTARGET_* helper
functions as this is probably the only reason we would ever invoke a
toolchain in the context of CTARGET.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.47, Repoman-2.3.10
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/9642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch uses openssl-1.1 specific functions when openssl version is
new enough. This fails for libressl (reporting itself as higher
version), the patch is updated to check for libressl version number too
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.48, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.47, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.47, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.47, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.48, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.47, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.47, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.47, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This package does not seem to be proxy-maintained, and there were no
commits indicating that it ever were.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/664212
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.48, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/380161
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.48, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reported-by: Jarek Rymut <jarymut+gentoo.bugs@gmail.com>
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/661790
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.48, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/664206
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.48, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.40, Repoman-2.3.9
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="sparc"
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.40, Repoman-2.3.9
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="sparc"
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.40, Repoman-2.3.9
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="sparc"
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.40, Repoman-2.3.9
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="sparc"
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.47, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
minor updates, eapi bump, qa warning fix
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.47, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Minimum change for stable 5.0.11. The big dependency fix is already
provided by 5.2.4.0.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/661414
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.48, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.48, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.48, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.48, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/664178
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.43, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/664178
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.43, Repoman-2.3.9
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Improve description.
Properly make opengl and X dependencies optional.
Add necessary REQUIRED_USE.
Thanks-to: Azamat H. Hackimov <azamat.hackimov@gmail.com>
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/623798
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Combined patch taken from Fedora Project
(https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/allegro/tree/master)
Fixes #540470
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/540470
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.48, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Version 1.9.98 dropped fuse support and some configure switches, correct
the ebuild for that version.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/649460
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/9033
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/9597
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.47, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.47, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.47, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.48, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- openssl-1.0.2a-x32-asm.patch dropped which shouldn't be
necessary anymore according to upstream [Link 1].
Link 1: https://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=3759#txn-62605
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/542618
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.48, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/360945
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/425912
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/663796
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/9028
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.48, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/661804
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.48, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.48, Repoman-2.3.10
|