| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/618724
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/7274
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/651284
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
11 branch is unsupported upstream now
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.27, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.27, Repoman-2.3.9
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The code is not fully compatible to Python 2 and upstream
stopped supporting Python 2 officially quite a while ago.
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.26, Repoman-2.3.7
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.26, Repoman-2.3.7
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.27, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
8.5.1).
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/651822
Signed-off-by: Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) <jmbsvicetto@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/651236
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/650924
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/650922
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/647830
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/7430
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/643732
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="sparc"
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/639704
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/648552
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/648552
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/5990
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/618176
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/618724
Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann <whissi@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Thanks K_F
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/646938
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org>
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="amd64"
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/7172
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|