10.2.0: revert "port binutils fix for CET detection on i486"

The patch is not ready for prime time. Le't pull newer upstream
version a bit later.

This reverts commit 5600e4343f36e2a4925b09388d3ffe7400143b9f.

Reported-by: Worx
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/777117
Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>

2 files changed, 0 insertions, 110 deletions

diff --git a/10.2.0/gentoo/44_all_cet-i486.patch b/10.2.0/gentoo/44_all_cet-i486.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 956e439..0000000
--- a/10.2.0/gentoo/44_all_cet-i486.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,109 +0,0 @@
-https://bugs.gentoo.org/777117
-
-From 267a609477624ade477994b24809a72eeb522ff1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: "H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
-Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2021 09:26:40 -0800
-Subject: [PATCH 2/2] GCC_CET_HOST_FLAGS: Check if host supports multi-byte
- NOPs
-
-Check if host supports multi-byte NOPs before enabling CET on host.
-
-config/
-
-	PR binutils/27397
-	* cet.m4 (GCC_CET_HOST_FLAGS): Check if host supports multi-byte
-	NOPs.
-
-libiberty/
-
-	PR binutils/27397
-	* configure: Regenerated.
-
----
- config/cet.m4       | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
- libiberty/configure | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
- 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
-
---- a/config/cet.m4
-+++ b/config/cet.m4
-@@ -130,6 +130,18 @@ fi
- if test x$may_have_cet = xyes; then
-   if test x$cross_compiling = xno; then
-     AC_TRY_RUN([
-+int
-+main ()
-+{
-+  asm ("endbr32");
-+  return 0;
-+}
-+    ],
-+    [have_multi_byte_nop=yes],
-+    [have_multi_byte_nop=no])
-+    have_cet=no
-+    if test x$have_multi_byte_nop = xyes; then
-+      AC_TRY_RUN([
- static void
- foo (void)
- {
-@@ -155,9 +167,10 @@ main ()
-   bar ();
-   return 0;
- }
--    ],
--    [have_cet=no],
--    [have_cet=yes])
-+      ],
-+      [have_cet=no],
-+      [have_cet=yes])
-+    fi
-     if test x$enable_cet = xno -a x$have_cet = xyes; then
-       AC_MSG_ERROR([Intel CET must be enabled on Intel CET enabled host])
-     fi
---- a/libiberty/configure
-+++ b/libiberty/configure
-@@ -5396,6 +5396,34 @@ else
-   cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext
- /* end confdefs.h.  */
- 
-+int
-+main ()
-+{
-+  asm ("endbr32");
-+  return 0;
-+}
-+
-+_ACEOF
-+if ac_fn_c_try_run "$LINENO"; then :
-+  have_multi_byte_nop=yes
-+else
-+  have_multi_byte_nop=no
-+fi
-+rm -f core *.core core.conftest.* gmon.out bb.out conftest$ac_exeext \
-+  conftest.$ac_objext conftest.beam conftest.$ac_ext
-+fi
-+
-+    have_cet=no
-+    if test x$have_multi_byte_nop = xyes; then
-+      if test "$cross_compiling" = yes; then :
-+  { { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: error: in \`$ac_pwd':" >&5
-+$as_echo "$as_me: error: in \`$ac_pwd':" >&2;}
-+as_fn_error $? "cannot run test program while cross compiling
-+See \`config.log' for more details" "$LINENO" 5; }
-+else
-+  cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext
-+/* end confdefs.h.  */
-+
- static void
- foo (void)
- {
-@@ -5432,6 +5460,7 @@ rm -f core *.core core.conftest.* gmon.out bb.out conftest$ac_exeext \
-   conftest.$ac_objext conftest.beam conftest.$ac_ext
- fi
- 
-+    fi
-     if test x$enable_cet = xno -a x$have_cet = xyes; then
-       as_fn_error $? "Intel CET must be enabled on Intel CET enabled host" "$LINENO" 5
-     fi
--- 
-2.31.0
-
diff --git a/10.2.0/gentoo/README.history b/10.2.0/gentoo/README.history
index f47a108..f195ae9 100644
--- a/10.2.0/gentoo/README.history
+++ b/10.2.0/gentoo/README.history
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 7		TODO
 	+ 42_all_vmat-PR97236.patch
 	+ 43_all_vtv-slibtool.patch
-	+ 44_all_cet-i486.patch
 
 6		29 Dec 2020
 	- 34_all_fundecl-ICE-PR95820.patch