summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMarek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org>2020-12-07 23:20:18 +0100
committerMarek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org>2020-12-08 00:05:32 +0100
commit1ebcd0064fc20fa3002b5c76efd6a28e21ad93bc (patch)
tree3d8c2a3b4df0ddb3a750a65aeb853227c4a3ab5d /dev-embedded
parentnet-analyzer/rrdtool: limit unmigrated ebuilds to dev-lang/lua:0 (diff)
downloadgentoo-1ebcd0064fc20fa3002b5c76efd6a28e21ad93bc.tar.gz
gentoo-1ebcd0064fc20fa3002b5c76efd6a28e21ad93bc.tar.bz2
gentoo-1ebcd0064fc20fa3002b5c76efd6a28e21ad93bc.zip
net-analyzer/rrdtool: migrate to lua.eclass
Featuring proper multi-impl support including testing. Lua bindings have been confirmed to build, test and install fine for all five implementations currently listed in LUA_COMPAT. Speaking of testing, in order for it to be complete the file "test.png" produced for each enabled Lua target by rrd.graphv should be visually inspected. For obvious reasons automating this would be way more trouble than it is worth (an image recogniser as a build-time dependency???), that said I *have* inspected those images while testing whether LuaJIT as well as PUC Lua 5.2, 5.3 and 5.4 really are supported (although upstream documentation says "Lua 5.0 or newer" their build scripts only explicitly mention PUC Lua 5.0 and 5.1, and LuaJIT is not mentioned in either) and they looked fine for all five implementations. Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/752780 Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'dev-embedded')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions