1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
|
Council meeting summary: 20110913
Agenda
------
* Roll call (5 minutes; anyone later will be given a slacker mark)
* Vote on whether to make Manifest signing mandatory (proposed by bonsaikitten)
* Review open bugs with council involvement
* Open floor - listen to the community
Meeting
-------
* roll call
here:
Betelgeuse
chainsaw
dberkholz
grobian
hwoarang
jmbsvicetto
ulm
* vote/discuss:
* Vote on whether to make Manifest signing mandatory (proposed by bonsaikitten)
The council didn't address this point in the meeting as there was no concrete proposal
to be discussed / voted by the council. Some council members addressed this issue in the
#gentoo-council channel with Patrick before the meeting.
* Review open bugs with council involvement
After an initial confusion about the number of open bugs, the council addressed the 9
open bugs[1].
[1] - https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem;remaction=run;namedcmd=council;sharer_id=42650;list_id=422625
* bug 331987 - https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331987
The council agreed with infra's suggestion to do an SMTP level bounce for mails directed
to the council ml. Tony will ask infra to provide the number of users affected, so the
council can reply to the 2nd question on comment #9.
* bug 341959 - https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341959
Council members agreed that this bug is fixed and decided Markos will ask Torsten if he's
ok with the bug being closed.
* bug 362803 - https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362803
Jorge acknowledged he forgot to update the xml file and will ask Torsten if he wants to
take care of the bug or he'll take care of it.
* bug 374931 - https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=374931
Everyone agreed this bug should be closed as the council webapp is already running.
Petteri will take care of this.
To help test the council webapp, Markos will try to use it for the next meeting.
* bug 234706 - https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=234706
Tony argued that since this bug lost its champion and that the affected arches
seem to be responsive again, the bug should be closed as OBSOLETE. The other
members agreed.
* bug 234711 - https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=234711
The council members decided to close this bug as OBSOLETE since it depends on
GLEP55 which was not accepted.
* bug 237381 - https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=237381
Donnie explained that he added a section to the council page following this
request. Other members agreed that section was clear enough and that the bug
should be closed as fixed.
* bug 316401 - https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316401
The council considers this bug to be resolved from council side and Petteri
will ask Christian about closing it.
* bug 330361 - https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=330361
Jorge addressed Fabian's question and explained that the current automatic
builds are working correctly and that python2 is set as default on stage3.
Jorge also explained that this bug is about not having python3 in the stages
and that his and releng opinion about that was presented clearly in the bug.
The council members agreed that council should not be involved on this bug
and decided to reassign the bug to releng and defer to their decision.
* Vote on a remaining issue from last meeting regarding echangelog generation
Before the meeting started, Donnie suggested we used any remaining time to
go over one issue that had remained from the previous meeting: should we
require that autogenerated changelogs have a way to edit them afterwards to
fix typos and such.
After a discussion about whether the council could vote on this issue or not,
there was a discussion about what was being voted on.
Jorge argued that as he recalled this issue had been considered "obsolete"
as the decisions in the previous meeting implied the existence of a file.
Fabian argued that even though that was his understanding at the meeting, after
rethinking about it, he thought it would be possible not to have a file. He
also acknowledged that he believed the intention had been to have a file.
In the end, given some open questions and nearing the end of the meeting, the
council decided to move this discussion back to the mls - Markos will start
a new thread, independent from the current git discussion, well before the
next meeting.
* listen to the community to see if there are any issues it would like
to see the council address in this term
No issues were brought up to the council by the community.
* Next meeting date
Tuesday, 20111011 1900 UTC
|
GitWeb